Understanding human sexuality is itself a complex topic to discuss.
These posts kicked up more of a furor than I anticipated, with a bunch of cross-postings and responses on other blogs. I go by Clarisse. Identifying as feminist and pro-BDSM can be really fraught territory — many avowed feminists regard BDSM with suspicion and some, on the more extreme end, with outright hatred.
Nine Deuce, a popular radical feminist blogger, has been known to assert that sadists are morally obligated to either repress their sadistic desires or kill themselves. I swear, I have the biggest crush on Audacia Ray. I want to be her when I grow up.
In Chicago, I lectured on BDSM and sexual communication, and I created and curated a fabulous sex-positive film series and discussion group that it broke my heart to leave. The film series was so successful that a group of loyalists gathered, formed a committee, and have continued it without me!
My degree is in Philosophy, Religious Studies and Studio Art, not anything gender-related — and when I was in college I remember that I often viewed hard-line feminist assertions with suspicion. The problem is, of course, exacerbated by the fact that definitions of feminism have become so varied and so many different issues have been attached to feminism by different people.
These are some of the reasons I tried to spend my entire Entitled Cis Het Men post series asking questions, rather than making assertions. One commenter who went by Sailorman over at Alas said, on the third post: I read this thread with interest, but it is of course basically a very extended and well written TPHMT argument?
I really am just interested in exploring various and often very discrete masculinity-related questions. No, really, I am. In the third one, I failed to make a point that really needed to be made, which is: So what comes clear from that correction is that, yeah — if we want to boil this down to the Oppression Olympics, I do think women have it worse than men and that America is still more centered around and gives more aggregate power to men.
But the whole point of those posts was to evade the Oppression Olympics! He was referring to the third post in particular, I think, in which I talk about how many feminist spaces are arguably hostile to men, and it might be in the interest of feminists to make them less hostile.
In that segment, my language became especially strong: I did things like refer to men as The Oppressive Class, for instance.
Oh, my broken feminist heart. I agree with Toy Soldier that this may not have been the best tactic. In general, I try to support debating as charitably and with as reasonable a tone as possiblewhich is something I did not succeed at in Part 3.
Another comment Toy Soldier posted: It seems more that, like many feminists, she wants to define the problem, define the terms, define the rules of discussion and define the solution. This is partly a reasonable point. I asked a bunch of interrelated but differently-focused questions.
And yet there were plenty of men who answered the posts, emailed me, etc. I confess that, as a man whom I imagine most people would probably define as normative — at least according to the criteria Clarisse has been using in her series — I have trouble with the premise of this question.
I have never found feminist discourses around gender and sexuality closed to me.
Does it sometimes make me uncomfortable? Do I think feminist discourse is always accurate in the way it speaks about men?
No, but that is not the same thing as saying it is closed to me. So let me be really, painfully, slowly clear over the course of many paragraphs. I can start by saying that get safe spaces; they are, in fact, extremely relevant for BDSMers. So, for example — given the history of radical feminism and BDSM — I am extremely unlikely to invite a radical feminist into my local dungeon or suggest that she attend a meetup for kinksters.
Yet at the same time, I know how exclusion feels, too. Actually, the compromise was easy. My aforementioned sex-positive film series makes a pretty good case study for this, I think yes! When I started the film series and a related meetup called Pleasure SalonI characterized both of them as open sexuality discussion spaces for everyone.
I promoted them heavily in radical sex communities, and I specifically invited every radical feminist I could think of — not just by listing radical feminists among the target audiences in the invitations, but also by personally calling any number of traditionally second-wave spaces around Chicago.
Not as many radical feminists attended as I would have liked, but some did, and I received feedback in person, by email, etc.Disorders of desire: Sexuality and gender in modern American sexology.
revised. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; LaRossa R. Grounded theory methods and qualitative family research. Journal of Marriage and Family. ; – Liu C. A theory of marital sexual life.
Journal of Marriage and the Family. ; – Loe M. Human sexuality has a very vital role in everyone’s life and society.
Understanding human sexuality is itself a complex topic to discuss. However, the topic becomes more complicated when discussed from a sociological point of view. Many researches have been conducted in the past on sociology and sexuality. Academy of Social Sciences ASS The United Kingdom Association of Learned Societies in the Social Sciences formed in gave rise to the Academy of Learned Societies for the Social Sciences incorporated , which became the Academy of Social Sciences on ASS Commission on the Social Sciences Notes from the meeting on by Ron Johnston.
Adolescent sexuality is a stage of human development in which adolescents experience and explore sexual feelings. Interest in sexuality intensifies during the onset of puberty, and sexuality is often a vital aspect of teenagers' lives.
In humans, sexual interest may be expressed in a number of ways, such as flirting, kissing, masturbation, or having sex with a partner. Opposite-sex people often engaged in sex for reasons outside of sexual attraction or desire. Opposite-sex partnerships were often arranged for economic purposes, rather than love or romance.
Heterosexual Culture In societies all over the world, heterosexual couples are represented as the dominant (and sometimes only) cultural sexuality. In western culture, heterosexuality is nearly omnipresent in a . May 29, · Compulsory heterosexuality, or heterosexism, can simply be defined as the dominant norm for sexual orientation, thus to take on any other form of sexual orientation outside the norm is seen as a deviant act (Germov & Poole , p).